I’ve been keeping a nice little mental note to compare the news stories I’m seeing o
n Digg.com and other tech related news sites and I’ve noticed a two to three day disceptancy between the rates that news is being posted on traditional sites such as slashdot.org, or hardocp.com compared to digg. I save a ton of time when I rely on Digg to get my news. But, on the flip side it seems to have been cutting down my surf time! This is both a good and bad thing. The good is obviously the less amount of time it requires me to stay informed on a lot of news, but the bad news is that I spend less time on the internet when I want to kill some time. Usually in these time-wasting moments I tend to visit sites like slashdot to view some interesting stories, but lately every time I do I’ve been bombarded with “Old News”.
Part of me wonders if the digg philosophy is actually beneficial to the community or detremental. The more readers rely on digg, the greater the likelyhood that the the news world will quickly become monolithic and one-sided. We run the risk of elemenating the differing view points and opinions of those writing the news. Can company’s like slashdot survive much longer? Sure the audience, and readership is servrely different from the Digg demographic, but ultimately the news articles are the same. It’s in the comments that we notice the differences. Quite Frankly, I don’t go to a news site for the comments… just to get the news.
Maybe I’m just a news junkie who feels an obsessive need to be up to date all the time, but, I would guess that a majority of the people who want news would spend their valuable time at the sites that are being most frequently updated. Not, those which are based on an almost archiac form of editing, and moderation. In the fast paced world in which we live the quicker users get results the more satisfied they will feel with each visit. Sure digg has its downfalls, but I believe they pale in comparision to their closest competitors. Afterall, they’ve created a new model from scratch. A model that puts the publishing/editorial power into the hands of the users. Something that had never before been accomplished, or quite possibly never before been thought of. To steal a terribly over used quote that was uttered back in 1546, and was made popular by Kurt Vonnegut in his novel Cat’s Cradle. “Rome ne fut pas faite toute en un jour.”, or “ Rome was not made in one day…”. Imagine the possibilities in other forms of media. Man! I would no longer have to watch Leaf (Toronto’s hockey team) updates every single day on Sportscenter. I believe all of Canada is with me on that…except for of course those living in centre of the universe (Toronto, for those international readers)! I can’t wait until I can select what types of news I want to watch instead of the types of news the media (read 80 year old men) is forcing down my throat.
It’s official, digg is my number one source of information! And, until something comes along that gives me more flexibility in what I’m viewing, and how quickly I can get updates, I don’t see any changes in the forseeable future.